Abstract (eng)
Surveillance of the society and its individuals has become an increasingly important issue, since time internet, electronic mail and world wide web have conquered the world. The ongoing technical progress will raise the level of surveillance to an unprec-edented scale, one can hardly imagine at this point.
“The Computer for the 21st Century” - Mark Weiser’s theory about the triumph of ubiquitous computing - no longer is a fictional story, as it was in the 90s. Ubiquitous computing has become part of our reality. Nowadays the buzzword “Internet of Things” takes a meaningful part in the ongoing process of monitoring individual-re-lated data.
Considering the possibility of exhaustive surveillance of the society, by the help of simple technical gadgets, such as an intelligent fridge or a biometric door lock, there are a lot of questions that come up: In what ways does Smart Home surveillance and other technical surveillance in private space, made possible by the Internet of Things, affect the personal lives of single individuals? Are the users themselves to blame for this kind of surveillance, because of the permission they give to institutions and gov-ernment, to control their individual-related data?
In order to answer these questions, this paper starts with a comprehensive theoretical analysis of different scientific theories from the genre of surveillance studies. The the-oretical part deals with works by authors such as Diana R. Gordon, Mark Poster, David Lyon and Anders Albrechtslund among others. Afterwards the topic’s relevance will be explained and a historical introduction, which investigates the work of Mark Weiser, will lead to the main part of the paper. The paper will conclude with the trans-disciplinary, theoretical analysis of the chosen example “Smart Home”. The analysis will include three focal points – media studies, sociology and biopolitics.