Titel
Insider apology for microeconomic theorising?
Autor*in
Mary S. Morgan
Department of Economic History, London School of Economics
Abstract
This comment on 'Economic theories and their Dueling interpretations' questions the descriptive adequacy of the ‘sociology of economics' proposed by Gilboa, Postlewaite, Samuelson, and Schmeidler (GPSS) (2022). We ask whether economists still perceive the role of microeconomic theory as central as do GPSS. In particular, is present-day economics unified by the principles of maximising, subject to constraints and equilibrium analysis? We argue that this is not the case. GPSS’ appeal to the interpretative flexibility of economic theories appears apologetic, especially the suggestion that theories and models, which once were considered positive descriptions or predictive instruments, are now cast as analytical or methodological exercises. We conclude on a more constructive note, drawing from the recent philosophical discussion of modelling which, quite paradoxically, grants highly idealized and simplified models a more important role than GPSS appear to allow.
Stichwort
Theoriesmodelseconomicsmicroeconomicsinterpretation
Objekt-Typ
Sprache
Englisch [eng]
Persistent identifier
https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/o:2084545
Erschienen in
Titel
Journal of Economic Methodology
ISSN
1350-178X
Erscheinungsdatum
2024
Seitenanfang
1
Seitenende
12
Verlag
Informa UK Limited
Projektnummer
818772 – European Union (all programmes)
Erscheinungsdatum
2024
Zugänglichkeit
Rechteangabe
© 2024 The Author(s)

Herunterladen

Universität Wien | Universitätsring 1 | 1010 Wien | T +43-1-4277-0