Abstract (eng)
The aim of this master thesis is to combine the topics integration and waste. Both are current issues,
which receive a lot of attention separately from each other in public discourses as well as in different
scientific disciplines.
Waste is not only a technical, but also a social and political issue. In Austria, the growing quantity
of domestic waste shall be managed by promoting waste prevention and recycling. In turn, waste
treatment in the MENA region (Middle East Northern Africa) is different from Europe: Most of the
waste is untreated disposed on landfills. Recycling rarely takes place.
Migration has been widely discussed in the years of 2015/2016, when tens of thousands of people
fled to Europe – particularly from war-torn Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq. People, who decided to stay
in Austria, should get ‚integrated‘. However, what does ‚integration‘ actually mean? The term is
controversial. One of the currently ruling parties in Austria, the ÖVP, considers the meaning of integration
as follows: „Integration through effort.“ Syrian refugees get to know the habitualities of the
country during the procedure of integration. They are obliged to complete German or/and so-called
value courses, which include the separate collection of waste or waste in public spaces.
This master thesis asks about the personal waste treatment of refugees. By means of surveys and a
subsequent evaluation based on the qualitative content analysis, it discusses to what extent Syrian
refugees living in Vienna are implementing the Austrian waste system in their daily life. A total of
nine interviews are carried out with people from Syria. The four topics of the questionnaire are:
waste management in Syria, waste knowledge/communication, recycling and waste prevention.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the survey: Firstly, in Syria reusable packaging and
longtime maintenance of goods instead of disposable packaging and obsolescence seem to be (still)
actual practice. Considering that long-term preservation of products is a desirable, but surpassing
goal in the Global North, development aid in waste management in the MENA region should be called
into question. Secondly, waste appears to pose not only a challenge for environment, but also for
health. Thirdly, a gap between awareness and actual action in separate waste collection can be identified.
Most of the questioned refugees state that waste separation is important for environmental
protection, but they only separate a few substances at home.
Last but not least, the refugees interviewed seem to have outstanding abilities to avoid waste. Even
though this behavior is also financially motivated, the question is whether and how Austrian society,
which is largely oriented by consumerism, could potentially benefit from the know-how of refugees
in waste prevention.