Abstract (eng)
Ken Burns and Lynn Novick's eighteen-hour documentary "The Vietnam War" broke viewership records in the U.S. for the PBS channel and was overwhelmingly well received by the press as well as the general public. Because of this enormous success, the film series is a powerful source in Vietnam discourse in the United States, and this thesis aims to find out how U.S. war crimes during the Vietnam War are talked about in the United States through an analysis of the movie. For decades, the My Lai massacre, in which GIs murdered over 500 civilians, was stylized as an isolated case of U.S. warfare. In the meantime, however, several other crimes have become known. A mainstream production like "The Vietnam War" sheds light on how new knowledge about war crimes was debated at the time of the broadcast in 2017. My question for the film was therefore: What narrative methods does "The Vietnam War" use to deal with US war crimes in Vietnam? And what conclusions can be drawn from the depiction of war crimes as well as from the documentary's reception at the time of the film's release? The analysis used for this purpose is divided into three components: a discussion of the discourse on U.S. war crimes in the Vietnam War to date, an analysis of the film's content and an analysis of its reception.